sMoRTy71.comsMoRTy71 - the personal website of Shawn Morton
sMoRTy71.com
sMoRTy71.comThe personal website of Shawn Morton
Monday, April 3, 2006
Personalization, the wrong way
While I was reading the NYT piece on You Tube, which I wrote about right before this post, I saw this article on Claria, the makers of the much-hated Gator web-tracking software.

Trying to shake off the negative stigma of Gator and all of those damn pop-up ads, Claria is moving toward web personalization. You install some app and they will track all of your activity and serve you related content on a personal start page. Woo Hoo! It's 1999 all over again.

Why is it that companies still don't get what makes content relevant on the web? There are a million personal start page services out there (that don't make you install software) and few (maybe none) of them are compelling.

For me, personalization isn't as important as "interestingness." This is a term that Flickr uses for one of its algorithms, but it is basically the same effect you get from sites like Digg and reddit. I use Digg every day and it is not personalized at all. It emphasizes what their user base finds interesting. Digg items that I consume are often not in topics that I would normally list as an interest.

I would rather see content filtered by people, especially if I could mark some people as more influential than others, rather than have some algorithm trying to figure out what I might like based on what I've done in the past. For example, if I have found someone who consistently diggs stuff that I like, I would like to be able to see all of that person's diggs bundled with blog posts from someone else who I enjoy reading bundled with photos from someone else whose photos I like.

Claria's approach to personalization sounds sort of like TiVo's Suggestions feature which I disabled years ago. It assumes that all activity is relevant and should be factored into the algorithm. It doesn't consider that I might read a sports-related story (maybe the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction at the Super Bowl), but not be interested in seeing more sports stories. And if I have to tune the algorithm to correct mistakes, then I might as well do the whole thing myself.

As with TV recommendations, I prefer to find web content through people I know, not through an algorithm.
Comments:
So, you'd say that the Amazon feature that lists "People who bought that book also bought these books", to be more interesting, than if they said, "here are a bunch more books on the same subject".

Seems like common sense, though it is far too uncommon out there right now...

Greg
 
Absolutely. I would much rather know what books someone actually purchased with this book than others suggested based on keywords.
 
reddit has a recommendation system. According to their faq: "Your votes are training a filter that recommends you links." In fact, they've had it for months... it does a good job of eliminating the digg-herd-mentality.
 
Helmut:
Thanks, I'll check it out. I don't use reddit nearly as much as I do Digg, so I hadn't noticed that feature.
 

blog comments powered by Disqus